After the watershed, it may be possible to justify the broadcast of explicit nudity and scenes of an explicit sexual nature, with the most explicit material being transmitted later in the schedule, well after the watershed.The inclusion of nudity and all references to sexual acts, verbal and visual, must be justifiable by the context.Less explicit nudity, however, for example above-waist nudity, catching a brief glimpse of someone from behind getting out of the shower, naturism, or topless sunbathing, is unlikely to be problematic as long as it is editorially justified. Nudity in a sexual context is unlikely to be acceptable before the watershed unless strictly limited, whereas nudity in the context of an item about health or education, for example a beauty treatment or medical examination, is less likely to exceed viewers' expectations, although a flagging should be considered.įull frontal nudity (both male and female), even in a non-sexual context, is unlikely to be acceptable before the watershed, unless there is a serious educational reason for showing it. Mild innuendo and oblique references to sex are more likely to be acceptable than comments or descriptions that leave little to the imagination. Even if the sexual activity is happening off camera, it may still be too suggestive for transmission before 9pm if it is clear what is happening.īefore the watershed, verbal references to sexual activity should be kept relatively inexplicit. ![]() It is most unlikely that any graphic sexual images or any explicit descriptions of sexual activity will be acceptable in pre-watershed programmes unless the programme has a serious educational purpose and, even then, any such material would require careful thought.įor example, whilst showing inexplicit acts of foreplay, for example kissing or hugging, is unlikely to be problematic in most pre-watershed programming, more overtly sexual activities, for example foreplay involving genitalia or showing nudity, oral sex, masturbation, or sexual intercourse, is very unlikely to be suitable for a family audience. serious, flippant, or crude) is likely to be a major factor in determining whether it is suitable or not. In addition, the way in which material is presented (e.g. What is acceptable in a mid-afternoon discussion programme aimed at adults may well not be suitable for inclusion in a Saturday morning magazine show, which attracts large numbers of children. This means the actual act of sexual intercourse, both real and where it's acted, as opposed to other sexual behaviour. Representations of sexual intercourse must not be shown unless there is ".Visual and verbal references to sex and matters related to sex should be editorially justified and appropriately limited and inexplicit.The inclusion of nudity, sexual behaviour, sexual imagery and references to sex should be editorially justified and defensible by the context in which they appear. Editorial Independence & Commercial References.Parliamentary Footage and Footage from Other Assemblies.Due Impartiality in Non-News Programmes.Due Impartiality, Due Accuracy and Undue Prominence of Views & Opinions.Abusive Treatment of Religious Views & Beliefs.Ofcom guidance notes on Fairness - including duty of care matrix.Descriptions or Demonstrations of Criminal Techniques.Material Likely to Encourage or Incite Crime or Lead to Disorder.Programmes Including Exorcism, the Occult & the Paranormal.Preserving Human Dignity, Scenes Showing Humiliation and Distress.Protecting Under 18s and Harm and Offence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |